PairBook
HomeBCDA › BCDA vs CCEL

BCDA vs CCEL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, BioCardia, Inc. (BCDA) and Cryo-Cell International, Inc. (CCEL) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.16
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.06
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1318.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BCDA and CCEL?

On 3 years of weekly data the BCDA/CCEL correlation comes out at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.16 over 1 year against -0.23 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.06, and annualized covariance runs at -1318.2 %².

Among the 13 assets we track against BCDA, CCEL sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CCEL outperformed by 36.1 percentage points (-39.7% for BCDA against -3.6% for CCEL). Note the risk asymmetry: BCDA runs 1.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BCDA vs CCEL: side by side

BCDA (BioCardia, Inc.)CCEL (Cryo-Cell International, Inc.)
1-year return-39.7%-3.6%
5-year return-97.4%-53.4%
Volatility (ann.)102.2%55.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.620.21
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.2%-66.3%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: CCEL -66.3% vs -95.2%Higher 5y return: CCEL -53.4% vs -97.4%
-60%0%+7%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BCDA · CCEL

Year-by-year returns

YearBCDACCEL
2022+7.7%-58.5%
2023-68.4%+35.9%
2024-78.0%+32.7%
2025-42.7%-50.6%
2026-6.4%+23.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BCDA and CCEL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BCDA and CCEL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BCDA and CCEL is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.16 over 1 year and -0.06 over 5 years.

Is CCEL a good diversifier for BCDA?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bcda-vs-ccel.json

BCDA vs CCEL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23BCDA vs CCEL-0.23

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BCDA vs CCEL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bcda-vs-ccel.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bcda-vs-ccel/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BCDA correlations · CCEL correlations