PairBook
HomeCBT › CBT vs VXZ

CBT vs VXZ: Correlation

How closely do Cabot Corporation (CBT) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.41, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.41
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.25
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.47
long-run
Ann. covariance
-300.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CBT and VXZ?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CBT and VXZ correlate at -0.41, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.25) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.41). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.47, with an annualized covariance of -300.5 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against CBT, VXZ sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #14. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CBT outperformed by 21.8 percentage points (+5.7% for CBT against -16.1% for VXZ).

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CBT vs VXZ: side by side

CBT (Cabot Corporation)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+5.7%-16.1%
5-year return+73.1%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)28.5%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5000.84-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.8%-36.4%
Market cap$4.4B
P/E (trailing)23.7
Dividend yield2.16%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -48.8%Higher 5y return: CBT +73.1% vs -53.1%
-24%0%+17%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. CBT · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearCBTVXZ
2022+21.4%+0.5%
2023+27.6%-44.0%
2024+11.3%-12.7%
2025-25.7%+5.7%
2026+29.1%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are CBT and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.41, CBT and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CBT and VXZ?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CBT and VXZ is -0.41 over 3 years, -0.25 over 1 year and -0.47 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for CBT?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.41, CBT and VXZ have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.41 mean?

A reading of -0.41 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cbt-vs-vxz.json

CBT vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.41CBT vs VXZ-0.41

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CBT vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cbt-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cbt-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CBT correlations · VXZ correlations