PairBook
HomeCBT › CBT vs IWM

CBT vs IWM: Correlation

Cabot Corporation (CBT) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) show a strong relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.60.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.60
strong
Correlation (1Y)
0.55
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.65
long-run
Ann. covariance
341.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are CBT and IWM?

On 3 years of weekly data the CBT/IWM correlation comes out at 0.60, strong. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.55 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.65, and annualized covariance runs at 341.1 %².

Among the 15 assets we track against CBT, IWM ranks #5 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: IWM led by 22.7 percentage points, +5.7% for CBT against +28.4% for IWM.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

CBT vs IWM: side by side

CBT (Cabot Corporation)IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF)
1-year return+5.7%+28.4%
5-year return+73.1%+41.5%
Volatility (ann.)28.5%19.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.841.06
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.8%-27.5%
Market cap$4.4B
P/E (trailing)23.7
Dividend yield2.16%0.91%
Expense ratio0.19%
Assets under management$80.1B
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · US Small & Mid Cap
Higher yield: CBT 2.16% vs 0.91%Smaller drawdown: IWM -27.5% vs -48.8%Higher 5y return: CBT +73.1% vs +41.5%

IWM, iShares's Small Blend fund, carries $80.1B under management, 1757 holdings, a 0.19% expense ratio, a 0.91% trailing dividend yield.

-24%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. CBT · IWM

Year-by-year returns

YearCBTIWM
2022+21.4%-20.5%
2023+27.6%+16.8%
2024+11.3%+11.4%
2025-25.7%+12.7%
2026+29.1%+22.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Fund exposure

Keep in mind that IWM holds CBT at a 0.14% weight, which makes a slice of this correlation mechanical rather than coincidental.

Are CBT and IWM good diversifiers for each other?

To a limited degree. At 0.60 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

FAQ

What is the correlation between CBT and IWM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CBT and IWM is 0.60 over 3 years, 0.55 over 1 year and 0.65 over 5 years.

Is IWM a good diversifier for CBT?

To a limited degree. At 0.60 the two still catch most of the same waves, so the pair smooths returns a little without insulating either from a shared selloff.

What does a correlation of 0.60 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cbt-vs-iwm.json

CBT vs IWM: 3-year weekly correlation 0.60CBT vs IWM0.60

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![CBT vs IWM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/cbt-vs-iwm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cbt-vs-iwm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: CBT correlations · IWM correlations