CACC vs HGV: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) and Hilton Grand Vacations Inc. (HGV) carry a correlation of 0.61, a strong link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are CACC and HGV?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of CACC and HGV correlate at 0.61, strong. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.62 over 1 year against 0.61 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.52, with an annualized covariance of 808.5 %².
Few assets follow CACC as closely as HGV, which ranks #3 of 10 tracked partners. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with CACC ahead by 24.9 points (+17.7% versus -7.2%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
CACC vs HGV: side by side
| CACC (Credit Acceptance Corporation) | HGV (Hilton Grand Vacations Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +17.7% | -7.2% |
| 5-year return | +4.2% | +1.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 36.8% | 36.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.30 | 1.38 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -32.7% | -34.6% |
| Market cap | $6.2B | $3.4B |
| P/E (trailing) | 13.1 | 25.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | CACC | HGV |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -31.0% | -26.0% |
| 2023 | +12.3% | +4.3% |
| 2024 | -11.9% | -3.1% |
| 2025 | -5.5% | +14.9% |
| 2026 | +35.4% | -2.1% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are CACC and HGV good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.61 means CACC and HGV share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between CACC and HGV?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between CACC and HGV is 0.61 over 3 years, 0.62 over 1 year and 0.52 over 5 years.
Is HGV a good diversifier for CACC?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.61 means CACC and HGV share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.61 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.61 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/cacc-vs-hgv.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/cacc-vs-hgv/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: CACC correlations · HGV correlations
