PairBook
HomeBRN › BRN vs STT

BRN vs STT: Correlation

Barnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN) and State Street Corporation (STT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.16.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.13
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.02
long-run
Ann. covariance
-189.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BRN and STT?

On 3 years of weekly data the BRN/STT correlation comes out at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.13 over 1 year against -0.16 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.02, and annualized covariance runs at -189.2 %².

Within BRN's tracked universe of 35 assets, STT comes in at #15 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: STT led by 91.8 percentage points, -19.1% for BRN against +72.7% for STT. One caveat on sizing: BRN is 2.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BRN vs STT: side by side

BRN (Barnwell Industries, Inc.)STT (State Street Corporation)
1-year return-19.1%+72.7%
5-year return-58.9%+144.9%
Volatility (ann.)53.1%22.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.220.97
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.5%-25.7%
Market cap$53.1B
P/E (trailing)17.1
Dividend yield0.00%1.74%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: STT 1.74% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: STT -25.7% vs -68.5%Higher 5y return: STT +144.9% vs -58.9%
-16%0%+76%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BRN · STT

Year-by-year returns

YearBRNSTT
2022+2.8%-13.8%
2023-16.5%+3.5%
2024-37.9%+30.2%
2025-26.5%+35.5%
2026-14.0%+52.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BRN and STT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, BRN and STT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BRN and STT?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BRN and STT is -0.16 over 3 years, -0.13 over 1 year and -0.02 over 5 years.

Is STT a good diversifier for BRN?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, BRN and STT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.16 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/brn-vs-stt.json

BRN vs STT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16BRN vs STT-0.16

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BRN vs STT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/brn-vs-stt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/brn-vs-stt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BRN correlations · STT correlations