PairBook
HomeBRN › BRN vs CCL

BRN vs CCL: Correlation

Barnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN) and Carnival Corporation (CCL) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-596.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BRN and CCL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BRN and CCL correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.33) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -596.1 %².

Among the 35 assets we track against BRN, CCL sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #31. Their 12-month results are close: -19.1% for BRN against -21.6% for CCL.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BRN vs CCL: side by side

BRN (Barnwell Industries, Inc.)CCL (Carnival Corporation)
1-year return-19.1%-21.6%
5-year return-58.9%+7.3%
Volatility (ann.)53.1%46.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.221.72
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.5%-42.3%
Market cap$34.2B
P/E (trailing)11.5
Dividend yield0.00%1.17%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Higher yield: CCL 1.17% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CCL -42.3% vs -68.5%Higher 5y return: CCL +7.3% vs -58.9%
-24%0%+17%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BRN · CCL

Year-by-year returns

YearBRNCCL
2022+2.8%-59.9%
2023-16.5%+130.0%
2024-37.9%+34.4%
2025-26.5%+22.6%
2026-14.0%-17.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BRN and CCL good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BRN and CCL?

The BRN/CCL correlation stands at -0.24 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.33, 5 years: -0.08), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is CCL a good diversifier for BRN?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/brn-vs-ccl.json

BRN vs CCL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24BRN vs CCL-0.24

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BRN vs CCL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/brn-vs-ccl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/brn-vs-ccl/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BRN correlations · CCL correlations