PairBook
HomeBRN › BRN vs RF

BRN vs RF: Correlation

How closely do Barnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.16, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.27
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.00
long-run
Ann. covariance
-246.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BRN and RF?

On 3 years of weekly data the BRN/RF correlation comes out at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.27) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.16). The 5-year figure is -0.00, and annualized covariance runs at -246.0 %².

Within BRN's tracked universe of 35 assets, RF comes in at #14 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RF outperformed by 34.5 percentage points (-19.1% for BRN against +15.4% for RF). One caveat on sizing: BRN is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BRN vs RF: side by side

BRN (Barnwell Industries, Inc.)RF (Regions Financial Corporation)
1-year return-19.1%+15.4%
5-year return-58.9%+83.5%
Volatility (ann.)53.1%29.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.221.09
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.5%-31.9%
Market cap$25.9B
P/E (trailing)12.4
Dividend yield0.00%3.45%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: RF 3.45% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RF -31.9% vs -68.5%Higher 5y return: RF +83.5% vs -58.9%
-16%0%+22%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BRN · RF

Year-by-year returns

YearBRNRF
2022+2.8%+2.3%
2023-16.5%-5.7%
2024-37.9%+27.0%
2025-26.5%+20.2%
2026-14.0%+14.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BRN and RF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, BRN and RF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BRN and RF?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with -0.27 over the last year and -0.00 over 5 years.

Is RF a good diversifier for BRN?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, BRN and RF have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/brn-vs-rf.json

BRN vs RF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16BRN vs RF-0.16

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BRN vs RF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/brn-vs-rf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/brn-vs-rf/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BRN correlations · RF correlations