PairBook
HomeBRN › BRN vs HLT

BRN vs HLT: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Barnwell Industries, Inc. (BRN) and Hilton Worldwide (HLT) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.22
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-240.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BRN and HLT?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BRN and HLT correlate at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.22 lands near the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.05, with an annualized covariance of -240.6 %².

By 3-year correlation, HLT places #26 of the 35 assets tracked against BRN. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months HLT outperformed by 37.2 percentage points (-19.1% for BRN against +18.1% for HLT). One caveat on sizing: BRN is 2.6 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BRN vs HLT: side by side

BRN (Barnwell Industries, Inc.)HLT (Hilton Worldwide)
1-year return-19.1%+18.1%
5-year return-58.9%+162.7%
Volatility (ann.)53.1%20.7%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.220.85
Max drawdown (3Y)-68.5%-26.4%
Market cap$73.3B
P/E (trailing)47.8
Dividend yield0.00%0.18%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Higher yield: HLT 0.18% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: HLT -26.4% vs -68.5%Higher 5y return: HLT +162.7% vs -58.9%
-16%0%+28%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BRN · HLT

Year-by-year returns

YearBRNHLT
2022+2.8%-18.7%
2023-16.5%+44.7%
2024-37.9%+36.1%
2025-26.5%+16.5%
2026-14.0%+13.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BRN and HLT good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, BRN and HLT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BRN and HLT?

The BRN/HLT correlation stands at -0.22 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.22, 5 years: -0.05), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is HLT a good diversifier for BRN?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, BRN and HLT have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.22 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/brn-vs-hlt.json

BRN vs HLT: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22BRN vs HLT-0.22

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BRN vs HLT correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/brn-vs-hlt.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/brn-vs-hlt/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BRN correlations · HLT correlations