PairBook
HomeBR › BR vs FLZH

BR vs FLZH: Correlation

Broadridge Financial Solutions (BR) and Flash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc. (FLZH) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2325.9
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BR and FLZH?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BR and FLZH correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.33 over 1 year against -0.24 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives -0.15, with an annualized covariance of -2325.9 %².

Among the 45 assets we track against BR, FLZH sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #42. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BR ahead by 71.6 points (-27.6% versus -99.2%). Risk is not evenly split, since FLZH carries 18.8 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BR vs FLZH: side by side

BR (Broadridge Financial Solutions)FLZH (Flash Sports & Media Holdings, Inc.)
1-year return-27.6%-99.2%
5-year return+16.0%-100.0%
Volatility (ann.)22.6%424.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.65-2.13
Max drawdown (3Y)-48.2%-99.9%
Market cap$20.9B
P/E (trailing)18.9
Dividend yield2.15%0.00%
Sector / categoryIndustrialsUS Listed
Higher yield: BR 2.15% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BR -48.2% vs -99.9%Higher 5y return: BR +16.0% vs -100.0%
-99%0%+55%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BR · FLZH

Year-by-year returns

YearBRFLZH
2022-25.3%-74.0%
2023+56.2%-48.5%
2024+11.7%-32.5%
2025+0.3%-70.4%
2026-17.0%-98.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BR and FLZH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BR and FLZH?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with -0.33 over the last year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is FLZH a good diversifier for BR?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/br-vs-flzh.json

BR vs FLZH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24BR vs FLZH-0.24

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BR vs FLZH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/br-vs-flzh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/br-vs-flzh/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BR correlations · FLZH correlations