BLMN vs SEAT: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Vivid Seats Inc. (SEAT) carry a correlation of 0.37, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BLMN and SEAT?
Over the past 3 years, BLMN and SEAT moved with a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.31 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is 0.37, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 1763.2 %².
Among the 20 assets we track against BLMN, SEAT ranks #15 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BLMN outperformed by 107.7 percentage points (+43.8% for BLMN against -63.9% for SEAT).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BLMN vs SEAT: side by side
| BLMN (Bloomin' Brands, Inc.) | SEAT (Vivid Seats Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +43.8% | -63.9% |
| 5-year return | -53.9% | -97.6% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 61.1% | 78.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.23 | 1.59 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -80.5% | -96.9% |
| Market cap | $0.9B | $0.1B |
| P/E (trailing) | 32.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BLMN | SEAT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -1.7% | -32.9% |
| 2023 | +45.5% | -13.4% |
| 2024 | -54.4% | -26.7% |
| 2025 | -46.6% | -92.2% |
| 2026 | +69.2% | -13.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BLMN and SEAT good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.37, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BLMN and SEAT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.37 over 3 years, with 0.31 over the last year and 0.37 over 5 years.
Is SEAT a good diversifier for BLMN?
A fair diversifier. At 0.37, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?
A reading of 0.37 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/blmn-vs-seat.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/blmn-vs-seat/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BLMN correlations · SEAT correlations
