PairBook
HomeBLMN › BLMN vs DIN

BLMN vs DIN: Correlation

How closely do Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.59, which is moderate.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.59
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.60
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.62
long-run
Ann. covariance
1559.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BLMN and DIN?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BLMN and DIN correlate at 0.59, moderate. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: 0.60 over 1 year against 0.59 over 3. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.62, with an annualized covariance of 1559.7 %².

In BLMN's tracked universe of 20 assets, DIN sits right near the top at #1. The trailing year gives DIN the advantage: +43.8% versus +52.0%, a 8.2-point spread.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BLMN vs DIN: side by side

BLMN (Bloomin' Brands, Inc.)DIN (Dine Brands Global, Inc.)
1-year return+43.8%+52.0%
5-year return-53.9%-49.2%
Volatility (ann.)61.1%43.4%
Beta vs S&P 5001.230.81
Max drawdown (3Y)-80.5%-63.3%
Market cap$0.9B$0.4B
P/E (trailing)32.656.5
Dividend yield1.35%3.07%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Lower P/E: BLMN 32.6 vs 56.5Higher yield: DIN 3.07% vs 1.35%Smaller drawdown: DIN -63.3% vs -80.5%Higher 5y return: DIN -49.2% vs -53.9%
-26%0%+64%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BLMN · DIN

Year-by-year returns

YearBLMNDIN
2022-1.7%-12.4%
2023+45.5%-20.3%
2024-54.4%-35.7%
2025-46.6%+14.1%
2026+69.2%+5.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BLMN and DIN good diversifiers for each other?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.59 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BLMN and DIN?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.59 over 3 years, with 0.60 over the last year and 0.62 over 5 years.

Is DIN a good diversifier for BLMN?

Somewhat, no more. With 0.59 correlation, most large moves hit both names, and the diversification benefit stays modest.

What does a correlation of 0.59 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/blmn-vs-din.json

BLMN vs DIN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.59BLMN vs DIN0.59

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BLMN vs DIN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/blmn-vs-din.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/blmn-vs-din/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BLMN correlations · DIN correlations