BLMN vs PLAY: Correlation
Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) and Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc. (PLAY) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.49.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BLMN and PLAY?
On 3 years of weekly data the BLMN/PLAY correlation comes out at 0.49, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.44 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.52, and annualized covariance runs at 1903.9 %².
Among the 20 assets we track against BLMN, PLAY ranks #7 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BLMN ahead by 107.7 points (+43.8% versus -63.9%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BLMN vs PLAY: side by side
| BLMN (Bloomin' Brands, Inc.) | PLAY (Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +43.8% | -63.9% |
| 5-year return | -53.9% | -74.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 61.1% | 63.8% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.23 | 1.25 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -80.5% | -86.6% |
| Market cap | $0.9B | $0.3B |
| P/E (trailing) | 32.6 | – |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BLMN | PLAY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -1.7% | -7.7% |
| 2023 | +45.5% | +51.9% |
| 2024 | -54.4% | -45.8% |
| 2025 | -46.6% | -44.5% |
| 2026 | +69.2% | -43.4% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BLMN and PLAY good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BLMN and PLAY?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BLMN and PLAY is 0.49 over 3 years, 0.44 over 1 year and 0.52 over 5 years.
Is PLAY a good diversifier for BLMN?
A fair diversifier. At 0.49, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.49 mean?
A reading of 0.49 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/blmn-vs-play.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/blmn-vs-play/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BLMN correlations · PLAY correlations
