PairBook
HomeBKD › BKD vs CANG

BKD vs CANG: Correlation

How closely do Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (BKD) and Cango Inc. Class A (CANG) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.21, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.23
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.07
long-run
Ann. covariance
-721.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BKD and CANG?

On 3 years of weekly data the BKD/CANG correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.23 over 1 year against -0.21 over 3. The 5-year figure is -0.07, and annualized covariance runs at -721.2 %².

Out of 13 assets tracked against BKD, CANG lands near the bottom at #9. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with BKD ahead by 143.6 points (+54.2% versus -89.4%). Note the risk asymmetry: CANG runs 2.1 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BKD vs CANG: side by side

BKD (Brookdale Senior Living Inc.)CANG (Cango Inc. Class A)
1-year return+54.2%-89.4%
5-year return+76.8%-60.9%
Volatility (ann.)41.3%84.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.151.14
Max drawdown (3Y)-43.6%-96.5%
Market cap$2.9B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BKD -43.6% vs -96.5%Higher 5y return: BKD +76.8% vs -60.9%
-94%0%+115%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BKD · CANG

Year-by-year returns

YearBKDCANG
2022-47.1%+36.2%
2023+113.2%-22.1%
2024-13.6%+331.4%
2025+114.5%-31.8%
2026+12.0%-82.7%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BKD and CANG good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, BKD and CANG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BKD and CANG?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.21 over 3 years, with -0.23 over the last year and -0.07 over 5 years.

Is CANG a good diversifier for BKD?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.21, BKD and CANG have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.21 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bkd-vs-cang.json

BKD vs CANG: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21BKD vs CANG-0.21

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BKD vs CANG correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bkd-vs-cang.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bkd-vs-cang/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BKD correlations · CANG correlations