BKD vs VTR: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (BKD) and Ventas (VTR) carry a correlation of 0.38, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BKD and VTR?
On 3 years of weekly data the BKD/VTR correlation comes out at 0.38, moderate. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of 0.44 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is 0.41, and annualized covariance runs at 340.4 %².
Within BKD's tracked universe of 13 assets, VTR comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. Over the last 12 months BKD came out ahead by 13.8 percentage points (+54.2% against +40.4%). One caveat on sizing: BKD is 1.9 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BKD vs VTR: side by side
| BKD (Brookdale Senior Living Inc.) | VTR (Ventas) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +54.2% | +40.4% |
| 5-year return | +76.8% | +98.1% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 41.3% | 21.5% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.15 | 0.25 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -43.6% | -16.7% |
| Market cap | $2.9B | $47.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 168.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.14% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Real Estate |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BKD | VTR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -47.1% | -8.5% |
| 2023 | +113.2% | +15.1% |
| 2024 | -13.6% | +22.2% |
| 2025 | +114.5% | +35.1% |
| 2026 | +12.0% | +21.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BKD and VTR good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.38, BKD and VTR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BKD and VTR?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BKD and VTR is 0.38 over 3 years, 0.44 over 1 year and 0.41 over 5 years.
Is VTR a good diversifier for BKD?
Reasonably. At 0.38, BKD and VTR keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.38 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bkd-vs-vtr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bkd-vs-vtr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BKD correlations · VTR correlations
