PairBook
HomeBIAF › BIAF vs ELMD

BIAF vs ELMD: Correlation

bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. (BIAF) and Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.31.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
-10331.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BIAF and ELMD?

On 3 years of weekly data the BIAF/ELMD correlation comes out at -0.31, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.48 versus -0.31 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.27, and annualized covariance runs at -10331.7 %².

ELMD is close to the least connected end of BIAF's tracked universe, ranking #21 of 24. The last year tells two different stories: ELMD led by 53.7 percentage points, -32.0% for BIAF against +21.7% for ELMD. One caveat on sizing: BIAF is 14.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BIAF vs ELMD: side by side

BIAF (bioAffinity Technologies, Inc.)ELMD (Electromed, Inc.)
1-year return-32.0%+21.7%
5-year returnn/a+144.2%
Volatility (ann.)691.4%48.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-2.100.63
Max drawdown (3Y)-99.6%-48.9%
Market cap$0.3B
P/E (trailing)24.5
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: ELMD -48.9% vs -99.6%
-94%0%+87%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BIAF · ELMD

Year-by-year returns

YearBIAFELMD
2022-19.3%
2023-8.1%+4.0%
2024-38.1%+170.9%
2025-95.7%-1.5%
2026+328.8%+3.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BIAF and ELMD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.31, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BIAF and ELMD?

The BIAF/ELMD correlation stands at -0.31 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.48, 5 years: -0.27), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ELMD a good diversifier for BIAF?

Yes: at -0.31, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.31 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/biaf-vs-elmd.json

BIAF vs ELMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31BIAF vs ELMD-0.31

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BIAF vs ELMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/biaf-vs-elmd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/biaf-vs-elmd/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BIAF correlations · ELMD correlations