PairBook
HomeBBW › BBW vs BIAF

BBW vs BIAF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) and bioAffinity Technologies, Inc. (BIAF) carry a correlation of -0.32, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.32
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.48
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
-10621.7
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BBW and BIAF?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BBW and BIAF correlate at -0.32, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.48) than the 3-year average (-0.32). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.27, with an annualized covariance of -10621.7 %².

BIAF is close to the least connected end of BBW's tracked universe, ranking #16 of 16. The last year tells two different stories: BIAF led by 18.4 percentage points, -50.4% for BBW against -32.0% for BIAF. Risk is not evenly split, since BIAF carries 14.3 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BBW vs BIAF: side by side

BBW (Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.)BIAF (bioAffinity Technologies, Inc.)
1-year return-50.4%-32.0%
5-year return+86.4%n/a
Volatility (ann.)48.4%691.4%
Beta vs S&P 5000.89-2.10
Max drawdown (3Y)-61.7%-99.6%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)9.1
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: BBW -61.7% vs -99.6%
-94%0%+14%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BBW · BIAF

Year-by-year returns

YearBBWBIAF
2022+22.1%
2023+2.8%-8.1%
2024+105.6%-38.1%
2025+35.4%-95.7%
2026-53.0%+328.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BBW and BIAF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.32, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BBW and BIAF?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BBW and BIAF is -0.32 over 3 years, -0.48 over 1 year and -0.27 over 5 years.

Is BIAF a good diversifier for BBW?

Yes: at -0.32, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.32 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.32 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bbw-vs-biaf.json

BBW vs BIAF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.32BBW vs BIAF-0.32

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BBW vs BIAF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bbw-vs-biaf.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bbw-vs-biaf/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BBW correlations · BIAF correlations