PairBook
HomeBF.B › BF.B vs TSN

BF.B vs TSN: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Brown–Forman (BF.B) and Tyson Foods (TSN) carry a correlation of 0.35, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.35
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.56
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
268.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BF.B and TSN?

On 3 years of weekly data the BF.B/TSN correlation comes out at 0.35, moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.56) than the 3-year average (0.35). The 5-year figure is 0.34, and annualized covariance runs at 268.2 %².

Among the 36 assets we track against BF.B, TSN ranks #20 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance TSN holds a 7.1-point edge, -7.4% against -0.3%. Do not treat this figure as fixed: across three years the rolling one-year correlation ranged all the way from -0.10 to 0.60.

+1.0+0.50-0.5-1.020232026-08-27
Rolling one-year correlation of weekly returns over the past three years.
How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BF.B vs TSN: side by side

BF.B (Brown–Forman)TSN (Tyson Foods)
1-year return-7.4%-0.3%
5-year return-56.8%-17.3%
Volatility (ann.)34.0%22.8%
Beta vs S&P 5000.510.19
Max drawdown (3Y)-64.8%-20.3%
Market cap$12.5B$19.5B
P/E (trailing)18.335.0
Dividend yield3.26%0.88%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesConsumer Staples
Lower P/E: BF.B 18.3 vs 35.0Higher yield: BF.B 3.26% vs 0.88%Smaller drawdown: TSN -20.3% vs -64.8%Higher 5y return: TSN -17.3% vs -56.8%
-20%0%+24%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. BF.B · TSN

Year-by-year returns

YearBF.BTSN
2022-8.9%-26.9%
2023-11.9%-10.4%
2024-32.2%+10.5%
2025-29.3%+5.7%
2026+6.6%-4.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BF.B and TSN good diversifiers for each other?

A fair diversifier. At 0.35, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BF.B and TSN?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.35 over 3 years, with 0.56 over the last year and 0.34 over 5 years.

Is TSN a good diversifier for BF.B?

A fair diversifier. At 0.35, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.

What does a correlation of 0.35 mean?

A reading of 0.35 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bf-b-vs-tsn.json

BF.B vs TSN: 3-year weekly correlation 0.35BF.B vs TSN0.35

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BF.B vs TSN correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bf-b-vs-tsn.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bf-b-vs-tsn/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BF.B correlations · TSN correlations