PairBook
HomeBF.B › BF.B vs RZLV

BF.B vs RZLV: Correlation

Brown–Forman (BF.B) and Rezolve AI PLC (RZLV) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.31
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.21
long-run
Ann. covariance
-862.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BF.B and RZLV?

Over the past 3 years, BF.B and RZLV moved with a correlation of -0.23, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Recent behaviour matches the longer record: -0.31 over 1 year against -0.23 over 3. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.21, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -862.6 %².

Among the 36 assets we track against BF.B, RZLV sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #34. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at -7.4% for BF.B and -5.5% for RZLV. One caveat on sizing: RZLV is 3.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BF.B vs RZLV: side by side

BF.B (Brown–Forman)RZLV (Rezolve AI PLC)
1-year return-7.4%-5.5%
5-year return-56.8%-69.8%
Volatility (ann.)34.0%109.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.511.36
Max drawdown (3Y)-64.8%-91.8%
Market cap$12.5B$1.2B
P/E (trailing)18.3
Dividend yield3.26%0.00%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Higher yield: BF.B 3.26% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BF.B -64.8% vs -91.8%Higher 5y return: BF.B -56.8% vs -69.8%
-50%0%+59%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BF.B · RZLV

Year-by-year returns

YearBF.BRZLV
2022-8.9%+3.4%
2023-11.9%+6.4%
2024-32.2%-64.5%
2025-29.3%-32.7%
2026+6.6%+14.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BF.B and RZLV good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BF.B and RZLV?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BF.B and RZLV is -0.23 over 3 years, -0.31 over 1 year and -0.21 over 5 years.

Is RZLV a good diversifier for BF.B?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

A reading of -0.23 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bf-b-vs-rzlv.json

BF.B vs RZLV: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23BF.B vs RZLV-0.23

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BF.B vs RZLV correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bf-b-vs-rzlv.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bf-b-vs-rzlv/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BF.B correlations · RZLV correlations