PairBook
HomeBF.B › BF.B vs FUL

BF.B vs FUL: Correlation

Brown–Forman (BF.B) and H. B. Fuller Company (FUL) show a moderate relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is 0.46.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.46
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.56
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.45
long-run
Ann. covariance
489.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BF.B and FUL?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BF.B and FUL correlate at 0.46, moderate. Lately the two have moved closer together, with the 1-year correlation at 0.56 versus 0.46 over 3 years. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.45, with an annualized covariance of 489.2 %².

Within BF.B's tracked universe of 36 assets, FUL comes in at #7 by 3-year correlation. Their 12-month results are close: -7.4% for BF.B against -6.1% for FUL.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BF.B vs FUL: side by side

BF.B (Brown–Forman)FUL (H. B. Fuller Company)
1-year return-7.4%-6.1%
5-year return-56.8%-10.4%
Volatility (ann.)34.0%31.0%
Beta vs S&P 5000.510.93
Max drawdown (3Y)-64.8%-43.5%
Market cap$12.5B$3.1B
P/E (trailing)18.317.2
Dividend yield3.26%1.64%
Sector / categoryConsumer StaplesUS Listed
Lower P/E: FUL 17.2 vs 18.3Higher yield: BF.B 3.26% vs 1.64%Smaller drawdown: FUL -43.5% vs -64.8%Higher 5y return: FUL -10.4% vs -56.8%
-20%0%+9%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BF.B · FUL

Year-by-year returns

YearBF.BFUL
2022-8.9%-10.6%
2023-11.9%+15.0%
2024-32.2%-16.2%
2025-29.3%-10.5%
2026+6.6%-3.0%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BF.B and FUL good diversifiers for each other?

Reasonably. At 0.46, BF.B and FUL keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BF.B and FUL?

The BF.B/FUL correlation stands at 0.46 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.56, 5 years: 0.45), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is FUL a good diversifier for BF.B?

Reasonably. At 0.46, BF.B and FUL keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.46 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bf-b-vs-ful.json

BF.B vs FUL: 3-year weekly correlation 0.46BF.B vs FUL0.46

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BF.B vs FUL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bf-b-vs-ful.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bf-b-vs-ful/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BF.B correlations · FUL correlations