PairBook
HomeBE › BE vs WM

BE vs WM: Correlation

How closely do Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and Waste Management (WM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.24, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.36
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.08
long-run
Ann. covariance
-410.2
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BE and WM?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BE and WM correlate at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.36) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.24). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.08, with an annualized covariance of -410.2 %².

Out of 12 assets tracked against BE, WM lands near the bottom at #8. The last year tells two different stories: BE led by 330.4 percentage points, +328.4% for BE against -2.0% for WM. One caveat on sizing: BE is 5.2 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BE vs WM: side by side

BE (Bloom Energy Corporation)WM (Waste Management)
1-year return+328.4%-2.0%
5-year return+914.6%+51.8%
Volatility (ann.)94.3%18.3%
Beta vs S&P 5002.560.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-52.7%-18.1%
Market cap$64.2B$87.0B
P/E (trailing)286.630.8
Dividend yield0.00%1.60%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Lower P/E: WM 30.8 vs 286.6Higher yield: WM 1.60% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: WM -18.1% vs -52.7%Higher 5y return: BE +914.6% vs +51.8%
-9%0%+476%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BE · WM

Year-by-year returns

YearBEWM
2022-12.8%-4.5%
2023-22.6%+16.2%
2024+50.1%+14.3%
2025+291.2%+10.5%
2026+150.7%-0.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BE and WM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BE and WM?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.24 over 3 years, with -0.36 over the last year and -0.08 over 5 years.

Is WM a good diversifier for BE?

Yes: at -0.24, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

A reading of -0.24 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/be-vs-wm.json

BE vs WM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24BE vs WM-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BE vs WM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/be-vs-wm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/be-vs-wm/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BE correlations · WM correlations