BE vs FNGD: Correlation
How closely do Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) and MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.33, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BE and FNGD?
On 3 years of weekly data the BE/FNGD correlation comes out at -0.33, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.49) than the 3-year average (-0.33). The 5-year figure is -0.36, and annualized covariance runs at -2339.1 %².
Out of 12 assets tracked against BE, FNGD lands near the bottom at #11. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BE outperformed by 384.1 percentage points (+328.4% for BE against -55.7% for FNGD).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BE vs FNGD: side by side
| BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) | FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +328.4% | -55.7% |
| 5-year return | +914.6% | -99.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 94.3% | 75.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.56 | -4.54 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -52.7% | -97.6% |
| Market cap | $64.2B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 286.6 | 20.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BE | FNGD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -12.8% | +52.2% |
| 2023 | -22.6% | -90.1% |
| 2024 | +50.1% | -76.6% |
| 2025 | +291.2% | -61.4% |
| 2026 | +150.7% | -49.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BE and FNGD good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.33 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BE and FNGD?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.33 over 3 years, with -0.49 over the last year and -0.36 over 5 years.
Is FNGD a good diversifier for BE?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.33 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.33 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.33 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/be-vs-fngd.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/be-vs-fngd/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BE correlations · FNGD correlations
