PairBook
HomeBDX › BDX vs FGNX

BDX vs FGNX: Correlation

Becton Dickinson (BDX) and FG Nexus Inc. (FGNX) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.16.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.03
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.05
long-run
Ann. covariance
-398.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BDX and FGNX?

Over the past 3 years, BDX and FGNX moved with a correlation of -0.16, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has tightened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.03) runs above the 3-year figure (-0.16). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.05, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -398.6 %².

Within BDX's tracked universe of 28 assets, FGNX comes in at #19 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: BDX led by 113.0 percentage points, +25.5% for BDX against -87.5% for FGNX. Risk is not evenly split, since FGNX carries 4.4 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BDX vs FGNX: side by side

BDX (Becton Dickinson)FGNX (FG Nexus Inc.)
1-year return+25.5%-87.5%
5-year return+6.8%-98.8%
Volatility (ann.)24.0%105.1%
Beta vs S&P 5000.33-0.07
Max drawdown (3Y)-39.6%-97.9%
Market cap$51.2B
P/E (trailing)32.9
Dividend yield2.20%0.00%
Sector / categoryHealth CareUS Listed
Higher yield: BDX 2.20% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BDX -39.6% vs -97.9%Higher 5y return: BDX +6.8% vs -98.8%
-90%0%+30%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BDX · FGNX

Year-by-year returns

YearBDXFGNX
2022+5.1%-24.2%
2023-2.7%-43.9%
2024-5.4%-45.5%
2025-12.6%-87.4%
2026+25.0%-42.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BDX and FGNX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, BDX and FGNX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BDX and FGNX?

The BDX/FGNX correlation stands at -0.16 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.03, 5 years: -0.05), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is FGNX a good diversifier for BDX?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, BDX and FGNX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

A reading of -0.16 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bdx-vs-fgnx.json

BDX vs FGNX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16BDX vs FGNX-0.16

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BDX vs FGNX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bdx-vs-fgnx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bdx-vs-fgnx/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BDX correlations · FGNX correlations