ANNA vs BDX: Correlation
AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) and Becton Dickinson (BDX) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.23.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ANNA and BDX?
On 3 years of weekly data the ANNA/BDX correlation comes out at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.33) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.19, and annualized covariance runs at -479.3 %².
Among the 103 assets we track against ANNA, BDX ranks #72 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months BDX outperformed by 59.8 percentage points (-34.3% for ANNA against +25.5% for BDX). Risk is not evenly split, since ANNA carries 3.7 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ANNA vs BDX: side by side
| ANNA (AleAnna, Inc.) | BDX (Becton Dickinson) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -34.3% | +25.5% |
| 5-year return | -71.7% | +6.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 88.7% | 24.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.92 | 0.33 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -86.3% | -39.6% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $51.2B |
| P/E (trailing) | 14.7 | 32.9 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.20% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Health Care |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ANNA | BDX |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | +5.1% |
| 2023 | +7.3% | -2.7% |
| 2024 | -37.6% | -5.4% |
| 2025 | -57.6% | -12.6% |
| 2026 | -3.0% | +25.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ANNA and BDX good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ANNA and BDX?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with -0.33 over the last year and -0.19 over 5 years.
Is BDX a good diversifier for ANNA?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.23 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.23 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/anna-vs-bdx.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/anna-vs-bdx/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ANNA correlations · BDX correlations
