PairBook
HomeANNA › ANNA vs BCIC

ANNA vs BCIC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) and BCP Investment Corporation - Closed End Fund (BCIC) carry a correlation of -0.41, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.41
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.49
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.35
long-run
Ann. covariance
-827.0
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ANNA and BCIC?

On 3 years of weekly data the ANNA/BCIC correlation comes out at -0.41, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.49 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.35, and annualized covariance runs at -827.0 %².

BCIC is close to the least connected end of ANNA's tracked universe, ranking #103 of 103. Over the last 12 months BCIC came out ahead by 7.3 percentage points (-34.3% against -27.0%). Note the risk asymmetry: ANNA runs 3.9 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ANNA vs BCIC: side by side

ANNA (AleAnna, Inc.)BCIC (BCP Investment Corporation - Closed End Fund)
1-year return-34.3%-27.0%
5-year return-71.7%-38.0%
Volatility (ann.)88.7%22.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.920.53
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.3%-52.7%
Market cap$0.1B$0.1B
P/E (trailing)14.7
Dividend yield0.00%17.34%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: BCIC 17.34% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BCIC -52.7% vs -86.3%Higher 5y return: BCIC -38.0% vs -71.7%
-43%0%+102%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ANNA · BCIC

Year-by-year returns

YearANNABCIC
2022+3.8%
2023+7.3%-9.0%
2024-37.6%+3.9%
2025-57.6%-15.8%
2026-3.0%-28.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ANNA and BCIC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.41, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ANNA and BCIC?

The ANNA/BCIC correlation stands at -0.41 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.49, 5 years: -0.35), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is BCIC a good diversifier for ANNA?

Yes: at -0.41, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.41 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/anna-vs-bcic.json

ANNA vs BCIC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.41ANNA vs BCIC-0.41

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ANNA vs BCIC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/anna-vs-bcic.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/anna-vs-bcic/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ANNA correlations · BCIC correlations