PairBook
HomeBCIC › BCIC vs EONR

BCIC vs EONR: Correlation

BCP Investment Corporation - Closed End Fund (BCIC) and EON Resources Inc. (EONR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.31.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.31
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.51
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.27
long-run
Ann. covariance
-984.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BCIC and EONR?

On 3 years of weekly data the BCIC/EONR correlation comes out at -0.31, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.51) than the 3-year average (-0.31). The 5-year figure is -0.27, and annualized covariance runs at -984.3 %².

EONR is close to the least connected end of BCIC's tracked universe, ranking #11 of 14. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months EONR outperformed by 77.1 percentage points (-27.0% for BCIC against +50.1% for EONR). One caveat on sizing: EONR is 6.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BCIC vs EONR: side by side

BCIC (BCP Investment Corporation - Closed End Fund)EONR (EON Resources Inc.)
1-year return-27.0%+50.1%
5-year return-38.0%-94.8%
Volatility (ann.)22.8%138.7%
Beta vs S&P 5000.53-0.81
Max drawdown (3Y)-52.7%-97.7%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield17.34%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: BCIC 17.34% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BCIC -52.7% vs -97.7%Higher 5y return: BCIC -38.0% vs -94.8%
-36%0%+344%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BCIC · EONR

Year-by-year returns

YearBCICEONR
2022+3.8%
2023-9.0%-80.2%
2024+3.9%-59.5%
2025-15.8%-53.2%
2026-28.2%+36.1%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BCIC and EONR good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.31 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BCIC and EONR?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.31 over 3 years, with -0.51 over the last year and -0.27 over 5 years.

Is EONR a good diversifier for BCIC?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.31 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.31 mean?

A reading of -0.31 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bcic-vs-eonr.json

BCIC vs EONR: 3-year weekly correlation -0.31BCIC vs EONR-0.31

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BCIC vs EONR correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/bcic-vs-eonr.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bcic-vs-eonr/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BCIC correlations · EONR correlations