BCE vs TTWO: Correlation
BCE, Inc. (BCE) and Take-Two Interactive (TTWO) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.16.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BCE and TTWO?
Over the past 3 years, BCE and TTWO moved with a correlation of -0.16, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.16) sits close to the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.02, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -94.9 %².
By 3-year correlation, TTWO places #11 of the 27 assets tracked against BCE. Neither side won the trailing year by much: -1.4% against +0.4%.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BCE vs TTWO: side by side
| BCE (BCE, Inc.) | TTWO (Take-Two Interactive) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -1.4% | +0.4% |
| 5-year return | -36.8% | +47.3% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 21.5% | 27.3% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.06 | 0.85 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -43.5% | -27.7% |
| Market cap | $21.8B | $43.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 4.8 | – |
| Dividend yield | 7.45% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Communication Services |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BCE | TTWO |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -10.6% | -41.4% |
| 2023 | -4.2% | +54.6% |
| 2024 | -35.5% | +14.4% |
| 2025 | +10.2% | +39.1% |
| 2026 | +0.8% | -9.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BCE and TTWO good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BCE and TTWO?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.16 over 3 years, with -0.16 over the last year and -0.02 over 5 years.
Is TTWO a good diversifier for BCE?
Yes: at -0.16, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?
A reading of -0.16 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bce-vs-ttwo.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bce-vs-ttwo/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BCE correlations · TTWO correlations
