BBW vs INLX: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc. (BBW) and Intellinetics, Inc. (INLX) carry a correlation of 0.25, a weak link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are BBW and INLX?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BBW and INLX correlate at 0.25, weak. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.32) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.22, with an annualized covariance of 730.4 %².
By 3-year correlation, INLX places #8 of the 16 assets tracked against BBW. Their 12-month results are close: -50.4% for BBW against -46.4% for INLX.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
BBW vs INLX: side by side
| BBW (Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc.) | INLX (Intellinetics, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -50.4% | -46.4% |
| 5-year return | +86.4% | +7.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 48.4% | 60.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.89 | -0.07 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -61.7% | -65.9% |
| Market cap | – | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 9.1 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | BBW | INLX |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | +22.1% | -43.5% |
| 2023 | +2.8% | +18.5% |
| 2024 | +105.6% | +171.7% |
| 2025 | +35.4% | -42.0% |
| 2026 | -53.0% | -34.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are BBW and INLX good diversifiers for each other?
Reasonably. At 0.25, BBW and INLX keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between BBW and INLX?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.25 over 3 years, with 0.32 over the last year and 0.22 over 5 years.
Is INLX a good diversifier for BBW?
Reasonably. At 0.25, BBW and INLX keep a meaningful degree of independence, and combining them has historically reduced portfolio volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.25 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/bbw-vs-inlx.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/bbw-vs-inlx/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: BBW correlations · INLX correlations
