PairBook
HomeBATL › BATL vs MMM

BATL vs MMM: Correlation

How closely do Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and 3M (MMM) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.16, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.42
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.09
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1176.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BATL and MMM?

On 3 years of weekly data the BATL/MMM correlation comes out at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.42) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.16). The 5-year figure is -0.09, and annualized covariance runs at -1176.8 %².

Among the 44 assets we track against BATL, MMM ranks #16 by 3-year correlation. Twelve-month performance is nearly a tie, at +12.7% for BATL and +16.4% for MMM. Note the risk asymmetry: BATL runs 8.5 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BATL vs MMM: side by side

BATL (Battalion Oil Corporation)MMM (3M)
1-year return+12.7%+16.4%
5-year return-87.1%+29.9%
Volatility (ann.)252.0%29.8%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.190.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.8%-20.7%
Market cap$0.1B$92.2B
P/E (trailing)31.9
Dividend yield0.00%1.68%
Sector / categoryUS ListedIndustrials
Higher yield: MMM 1.68% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MMM -20.7% vs -95.8%Higher 5y return: MMM +29.9% vs -87.1%
-8%0%+1951%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BATL · MMM

Year-by-year returns

YearBATLMMM
2022-0.9%-29.6%
2023-1.0%-3.3%
2024-82.1%+46.1%
2025-34.3%+26.4%
2026+17.7%+13.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BATL and MMM good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, BATL and MMM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BATL and MMM?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between BATL and MMM is -0.16 over 3 years, -0.42 over 1 year and -0.09 over 5 years.

Is MMM a good diversifier for BATL?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, BATL and MMM have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.16 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/batl-vs-mmm.json

BATL vs MMM: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16BATL vs MMM-0.16

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![BATL vs MMM correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/batl-vs-mmm.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/batl-vs-mmm/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BATL correlations · MMM correlations