PairBook
HomeBATL › BATL vs IFF

BATL vs IFF: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF) carry a correlation of -0.23, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.23
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.13
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1686.8
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BATL and IFF?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of BATL and IFF correlate at -0.23, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.37) than the 3-year average (-0.23). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.13, with an annualized covariance of -1686.8 %².

Within BATL's tracked universe of 44 assets, IFF comes in at #31 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months IFF outperformed by 20.5 percentage points (+12.7% for BATL against +33.2% for IFF). Risk is not evenly split, since BATL carries 8.5 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BATL vs IFF: side by side

BATL (Battalion Oil Corporation)IFF (International Flavors & Fragrances)
1-year return+12.7%+33.2%
5-year return-87.1%-34.3%
Volatility (ann.)252.0%29.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.190.69
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.8%-42.6%
Market cap$0.1B$22.2B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%1.84%
Sector / categoryUS ListedMaterials
Higher yield: IFF 1.84% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: IFF -42.6% vs -95.8%Higher 5y return: IFF -34.3% vs -87.1%
-9%0%+1951%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). BATL · IFF

Year-by-year returns

YearBATLIFF
2022-0.9%-28.3%
2023-1.0%-19.5%
2024-82.1%+6.3%
2025-34.3%-18.4%
2026+17.7%+30.3%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BATL and IFF good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BATL and IFF?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.23 over 3 years, with -0.37 over the last year and -0.13 over 5 years.

Is IFF a good diversifier for BATL?

Yes: at -0.23, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.23 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/batl-vs-iff.json

BATL vs IFF: 3-year weekly correlation -0.23BATL vs IFF-0.23

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![BATL vs IFF correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/batl-vs-iff.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/batl-vs-iff/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BATL correlations · IFF correlations