PairBook
HomeBATL › BATL vs GDX

BATL vs GDX: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.37
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-2205.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are BATL and GDX?

On 3 years of weekly data the BATL/GDX correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.37) than the 3-year average (-0.21). The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -2205.3 %².

Among the 44 assets we track against BATL, GDX ranks #27 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with GDX ahead by 57.2 points (+12.7% versus +69.9%). Note the risk asymmetry: BATL runs 6.2 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

BATL vs GDX: side by side

BATL (Battalion Oil Corporation)GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF)
1-year return+12.7%+69.9%
5-year return-87.1%+245.5%
Volatility (ann.)252.0%40.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.190.88
Max drawdown (3Y)-95.8%-38.9%
Market cap$0.1B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedETF · Commodities
Smaller drawdown: GDX -38.9% vs -95.8%Higher 5y return: GDX +245.5% vs -87.1%
-5%0%+1951%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. BATL · GDX

Year-by-year returns

YearBATLGDX
2022-0.9%-9.0%
2023-1.0%+10.0%
2024-82.1%+10.6%
2025-34.3%+154.8%
2026+17.7%+20.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are BATL and GDX good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between BATL and GDX?

The BATL/GDX correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.37, 5 years: -0.12), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is GDX a good diversifier for BATL?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.21 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/batl-vs-gdx.json

BATL vs GDX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21BATL vs GDX-0.21

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![BATL vs GDX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/batl-vs-gdx.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/batl-vs-gdx/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: BATL correlations · GDX correlations