PairBook
HomeAUC › AUC vs ICE

AUC vs ICE: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, ATIF Holdings Limited (AUC) and Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) carry a correlation of -0.21, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.21
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-477.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AUC and ICE?

On 3 years of weekly data the AUC/ICE correlation comes out at -0.21, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.19 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -477.4 %².

Among the 24 assets we track against AUC, ICE sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #20. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months AUC outperformed by 25.1 percentage points (+17.2% for AUC against -7.9% for ICE). Risk is not evenly split, since AUC carries 5.1 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AUC vs ICE: side by side

AUC (ATIF Holdings Limited)ICE (Intercontinental Exchange)
1-year return+17.2%-7.9%
5-year return-88.8%+44.2%
Volatility (ann.)108.2%21.2%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.390.62
Max drawdown (3Y)-88.5%-33.9%
Market cap$0.1B$90.5B
P/E (trailing)22.7
Dividend yield0.00%1.24%
Sector / categoryUS ListedFinancials
Higher yield: ICE 1.24% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ICE -33.9% vs -88.5%Higher 5y return: ICE +44.2% vs -88.8%
-28%0%+46%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). AUC · ICE

Year-by-year returns

YearAUCICE
2022-30.4%-23.9%
2023-53.3%+27.1%
2024+2.5%+17.5%
2025-70.6%+9.9%
2026+19.9%+0.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AUC and ICE good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AUC and ICE?

The AUC/ICE correlation stands at -0.21 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.19, 5 years: -0.14), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ICE a good diversifier for AUC?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.21 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.21 mean?

A reading of -0.21 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/auc-vs-ice.json

AUC vs ICE: 3-year weekly correlation -0.21AUC vs ICE-0.21

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![AUC vs ICE correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/auc-vs-ice.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/auc-vs-ice/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AUC correlations · ICE correlations