AUC vs BMR: Correlation
How closely do ATIF Holdings Limited (AUC) and Beamr Imaging Ltd. (BMR) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of 0.28, which is weak.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AUC and BMR?
Over the past 3 years, AUC and BMR moved with a correlation of 0.28, which is weak. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at 0.06 versus 0.28 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is n/a, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 9737.6 %².
Within AUC's tracked universe of 24 assets, BMR comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with AUC ahead by 75.0 points (+17.2% versus -57.8%). Risk is not evenly split, since BMR carries 3.0 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AUC vs BMR: side by side
| AUC (ATIF Holdings Limited) | BMR (Beamr Imaging Ltd.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +17.2% | -57.8% |
| 5-year return | -88.8% | n/a |
| Volatility (ann.) | 108.2% | 324.4% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.39 | 1.15 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -88.5% | -92.7% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AUC | BMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -30.4% | – |
| 2023 | -53.3% | – |
| 2024 | +2.5% | +239.3% |
| 2025 | -70.6% | -68.1% |
| 2026 | +19.9% | -18.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AUC and BMR good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.28 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AUC and BMR?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AUC and BMR is 0.28 over 3 years, 0.06 over 1 year and n/a over 5 years.
Is BMR a good diversifier for AUC?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.28 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.28 mean?
A reading of 0.28 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/auc-vs-bmr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/auc-vs-bmr/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AUC correlations · BMR correlations
