PairBook
HomeAUC › AUC vs CTSH

AUC vs CTSH: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, ATIF Holdings Limited (AUC) and Cognizant (CTSH) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.33
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.15
long-run
Ann. covariance
-679.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AUC and CTSH?

Over the past 3 years, AUC and CTSH moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.33 versus -0.19 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.15, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -679.1 %².

Among the 24 assets we track against AUC, CTSH ranks #18 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: AUC led by 27.0 percentage points, +17.2% for AUC against -9.8% for CTSH. One caveat on sizing: AUC is 3.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AUC vs CTSH: side by side

AUC (ATIF Holdings Limited)CTSH (Cognizant)
1-year return+17.2%-9.8%
5-year return-88.8%-9.6%
Volatility (ann.)108.2%32.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.390.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-88.5%-56.1%
Market cap$0.1B$28.7B
P/E (trailing)13.3
Dividend yield0.00%2.09%
Sector / categoryUS ListedInformation Technology
Higher yield: CTSH 2.09% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: CTSH -56.1% vs -88.5%Higher 5y return: CTSH -9.6% vs -88.8%
-43%0%+46%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AUC · CTSH

Year-by-year returns

YearAUCCTSH
2022-30.4%-34.5%
2023-53.3%+34.4%
2024+2.5%+3.5%
2025-70.6%+9.7%
2026+19.9%-21.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AUC and CTSH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AUC and CTSH?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AUC and CTSH is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.33 over 1 year and -0.15 over 5 years.

Is CTSH a good diversifier for AUC?

Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

A reading of -0.19 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/auc-vs-ctsh.json

AUC vs CTSH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19AUC vs CTSH-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![AUC vs CTSH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/auc-vs-ctsh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/auc-vs-ctsh/)

Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AUC correlations · CTSH correlations