PairBook
HomeATCH › ATCH vs NOMD

ATCH vs NOMD: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (ATCH) and Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) carry a correlation of -0.27, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.27
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-1121.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ATCH and NOMD?

On 3 years of weekly data the ATCH/NOMD correlation comes out at -0.27, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.29 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.20, and annualized covariance runs at -1121.4 %².

Among the 10 assets we track against ATCH, NOMD sits near the bottom by co-movement, at rank #10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ATCH outperformed by 17.2 percentage points (-1.0% for ATCH against -18.2% for NOMD). One caveat on sizing: ATCH is 5.4 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ATCH vs NOMD: side by side

ATCH (AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.)NOMD (Nomad Foods Limited)
1-year return-1.0%-18.2%
5-year return-100.0%-48.6%
Volatility (ann.)149.4%27.7%
Beta vs S&P 5002.520.16
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-52.8%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)12.0
Dividend yield0.00%4.83%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: NOMD 4.83% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: NOMD -52.8% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: NOMD -48.6% vs -100.0%
-34%0%+343%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ATCH · NOMD

Year-by-year returns

YearATCHNOMD
2022+1.6%-32.1%
2023-38.3%-1.7%
2024-97.4%+2.4%
2025-97.4%-22.1%
2026-23.9%+0.4%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ATCH and NOMD good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, ATCH and NOMD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ATCH and NOMD?

The ATCH/NOMD correlation stands at -0.27 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.29, 5 years: -0.20), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is NOMD a good diversifier for ATCH?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.27, ATCH and NOMD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.27 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/atch-vs-nomd.json

ATCH vs NOMD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.27ATCH vs NOMD-0.27

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ATCH vs NOMD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/atch-vs-nomd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/atch-vs-nomd/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ATCH correlations · NOMD correlations