PairBook
HomeATCH › ATCH vs MLCI

ATCH vs MLCI: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, AtlasClear Holdings, Inc. (ATCH) and Mount Logan Capital Inc. (MLCI) carry a correlation of 0.36, a moderate link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
0.36
moderate
Correlation (1Y)
0.57
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
0.34
long-run
Ann. covariance
2938.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ATCH and MLCI?

Over the past 3 years, ATCH and MLCI moved with a correlation of 0.36, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a tighter link (0.57) than the 3-year average (0.36). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.34, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 2938.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, MLCI places #5 of the 10 assets tracked against ATCH. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with ATCH ahead by 29.2 points (-1.0% versus -30.2%). Note the risk asymmetry: ATCH runs 2.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ATCH vs MLCI: side by side

ATCH (AtlasClear Holdings, Inc.)MLCI (Mount Logan Capital Inc.)
1-year return-1.0%-30.2%
5-year return-100.0%-55.0%
Volatility (ann.)149.4%54.8%
Beta vs S&P 5002.520.45
Max drawdown (3Y)-100.0%-68.8%
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%4.68%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Higher yield: MLCI 4.68% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MLCI -68.8% vs -100.0%Higher 5y return: MLCI -55.0% vs -100.0%
-39%0%+343%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ATCH · MLCI

Year-by-year returns

YearATCHMLCI
2022+1.6%-28.2%
2023-38.3%-22.3%
2024-97.4%-10.5%
2025-97.4%+125.7%
2026-23.9%-60.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ATCH and MLCI good diversifiers for each other?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.36 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ATCH and MLCI?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ATCH and MLCI is 0.36 over 3 years, 0.57 over 1 year and 0.34 over 5 years.

Is MLCI a good diversifier for ATCH?

Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.36 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.

What does a correlation of 0.36 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/atch-vs-mlci.json

ATCH vs MLCI: 3-year weekly correlation 0.36ATCH vs MLCI0.36

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ATCH vs MLCI correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/atch-vs-mlci.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/atch-vs-mlci/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ATCH correlations · MLCI correlations