PairBook
HomeASST › ASST vs ZBH

ASST vs ZBH: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Strive, Inc. (ASST) and Zimmer Biomet (ZBH) carry a correlation of -0.17, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.18
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
n/a
long-run
Ann. covariance
-3007.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ASST and ZBH?

On 3 years of weekly data the ASST/ZBH correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.18 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is n/a, and annualized covariance runs at -3007.3 %².

Within ASST's tracked universe of 58 assets, ZBH comes in at #17 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months ZBH outperformed by 74.5 percentage points (-80.4% for ASST against -5.9% for ZBH). Risk is not evenly split, since ASST carries 29.0 times the volatility of the other side.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ASST vs ZBH: side by side

ASST (Strive, Inc.)ZBH (Zimmer Biomet)
1-year return-80.4%-5.9%
5-year returnn/a-28.6%
Volatility (ann.)723.1%24.9%
Beta vs S&P 500-1.010.51
Max drawdown (3Y)-97.2%-38.8%
Market cap$2.1B$19.0B
P/E (trailing)24.6
Dividend yield0.00%0.95%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Higher yield: ZBH 0.95% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: ZBH -38.8% vs -97.2%
-91%0%+87%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. ASST · ZBH

Year-by-year returns

YearASSTZBH
2022+4.2%
2023-3.8%
2024-84.6%-12.5%
2025+50.3%-14.0%
2026+56.6%+11.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ASST and ZBH good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, ASST and ZBH have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ASST and ZBH?

The ASST/ZBH correlation stands at -0.17 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.18, 5 years: n/a), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is ZBH a good diversifier for ASST?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.17, ASST and ZBH have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/asst-vs-zbh.json

ASST vs ZBH: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17ASST vs ZBH-0.17

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![ASST vs ZBH correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/asst-vs-zbh.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/asst-vs-zbh/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ASST correlations · ZBH correlations