PairBook
HomeAPH › APH vs MXC

APH vs MXC: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Amphenol (APH) and Mexco Energy Corporation (MXC) carry a correlation of -0.16, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.16
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.38
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.04
long-run
Ann. covariance
-329.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are APH and MXC?

On 3 years of weekly data the APH/MXC correlation comes out at -0.16, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.38) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.16). The 5-year figure is -0.04, and annualized covariance runs at -329.5 %².

Among the 38 assets we track against APH, MXC ranks #29 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months APH outperformed by 25.9 percentage points (+47.5% for APH against +21.6% for MXC). One caveat on sizing: MXC is 1.8 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

APH vs MXC: side by side

APH (Amphenol)MXC (Mexco Energy Corporation)
1-year return+47.5%+21.6%
5-year return+338.9%+7.2%
Volatility (ann.)33.6%62.1%
Beta vs S&P 5001.57-0.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-28.2%-60.6%
Market cap$199.0B
P/E (trailing)40.313.0
Dividend yield0.57%1.02%
Sector / categoryInformation TechnologyUS Listed
Lower P/E: MXC 13.0 vs 40.3Higher yield: MXC 1.02% vs 0.57%Smaller drawdown: APH -28.2% vs -60.6%Higher 5y return: APH +338.9% vs +7.2%
-12%0%+77%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. APH · MXC

Year-by-year returns

YearAPHMXC
2022-12.0%+33.0%
2023+31.5%-26.2%
2024+41.3%+24.6%
2025+96.1%-10.8%
2026+19.8%-0.6%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are APH and MXC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, APH and MXC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between APH and MXC?

The APH/MXC correlation stands at -0.16 on a 3-year window (1 year: -0.38, 5 years: -0.04), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.

Is MXC a good diversifier for APH?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.16, APH and MXC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.16 mean?

A reading of -0.16 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aph-vs-mxc.json

APH vs MXC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.16APH vs MXC-0.16

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![APH vs MXC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/aph-vs-mxc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aph-vs-mxc/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: APH correlations · MXC correlations