APH vs VT: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, Amphenol (APH) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) carry a correlation of 0.69, a strong link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are APH and VT?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of APH and VT correlate at 0.69, strong. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (0.55) runs below the 3-year figure (0.69). Stretching to 5 years gives 0.71, with an annualized covariance of 321.4 %².
Within APH's tracked universe of 38 assets, VT comes in at #5 by 3-year correlation. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with APH ahead by 24.8 points (+47.5% versus +22.7%). Across three years, the rolling one-year figure varied moderately, from 0.52 to 0.82. Risk is not evenly split, since APH carries 2.4 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
APH vs VT: side by side
| APH (Amphenol) | VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +47.5% | +22.7% |
| 5-year return | +338.9% | +67.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 33.6% | 13.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.57 | 0.92 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -28.2% | -16.5% |
| Market cap | $199.0B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 40.3 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.57% | 1.59% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.06% |
| Assets under management | – | $97.9B |
| Sector / category | Information Technology | ETF · Global |
VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | APH | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -12.0% | -18.0% |
| 2023 | +31.5% | +22.0% |
| 2024 | +41.3% | +16.5% |
| 2025 | +96.1% | +22.4% |
| 2026 | +19.8% | +15.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Fund exposure
A structural note: 0.18% of VT is APH itself, so the fund partly moves with the stock by construction.
Are APH and VT good diversifiers for each other?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.69 means APH and VT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
FAQ
What is the correlation between APH and VT?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: 0.69 over 3 years, with 0.55 over the last year and 0.71 over 5 years.
Is VT a good diversifier for APH?
Only partially. A correlation of 0.69 means APH and VT share most of their swings. Pairing them dampens volatility somewhat, but it will not protect against a common drawdown.
What does a correlation of 0.69 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, 0.69 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aph-vs-vt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aph-vs-vt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: APH correlations · VT correlations
