ANNA vs XLY: Correlation
AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.19.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ANNA and XLY?
Over the past 3 years, ANNA and XLY moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The past 12 months show a weaker link (-0.43) than the 3-year average (-0.19). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.14, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -331.8 %².
By 3-year correlation, XLY places #51 of the 103 assets tracked against ANNA. The last year tells two different stories: XLY led by 34.2 percentage points, -34.3% for ANNA against -0.1% for XLY. One caveat on sizing: ANNA is 4.5 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ANNA vs XLY: side by side
| ANNA (AleAnna, Inc.) | XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -34.3% | -0.1% |
| 5-year return | -71.7% | +31.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 88.7% | 19.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.92 | 1.15 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -86.3% | -26.0% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 14.7 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.78% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.08% |
| Assets under management | – | $22.5B |
| Sector / category | US Listed | Sector ETF |
XLY is a Consumer Cyclical fund from State Street Investment Management: $22.5B under management, 47 holdings, a 0.08% expense ratio, a 0.78% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ANNA | XLY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -36.3% |
| 2023 | +7.3% | +39.6% |
| 2024 | -37.6% | +26.5% |
| 2025 | -57.6% | +7.4% |
| 2026 | -3.0% | -2.6% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ANNA and XLY good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ANNA and XLY?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.19 over 3 years, with -0.43 over the last year and -0.14 over 5 years.
Is XLY a good diversifier for ANNA?
Yes: at -0.19, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/anna-vs-xly.json
Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/anna-vs-xly/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ANNA correlations · XLY correlations
