ANNA vs VT: Correlation
AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.17.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ANNA and VT?
On 3 years of weekly data the ANNA/VT correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.54 versus -0.17 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.12, and annualized covariance runs at -205.0 %².
Within ANNA's tracked universe of 103 assets, VT comes in at #35 by 3-year correlation. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months VT outperformed by 57.0 percentage points (-34.3% for ANNA against +22.7% for VT). Note the risk asymmetry: ANNA runs 6.4 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ANNA vs VT: side by side
| ANNA (AleAnna, Inc.) | VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -34.3% | +22.7% |
| 5-year return | -71.7% | +67.7% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 88.7% | 13.9% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.92 | 0.92 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -86.3% | -16.5% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | 14.7 | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.59% |
| Expense ratio | – | 0.06% |
| Assets under management | – | $97.9B |
| Sector / category | US Listed | ETF · Global |
VT is a Global Large-Stock Blend fund from Vanguard: $97.9B under management, 5308 holdings, a 0.06% expense ratio, a 1.59% trailing dividend yield.
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ANNA | VT |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -18.0% |
| 2023 | +7.3% | +22.0% |
| 2024 | -37.6% | +16.5% |
| 2025 | -57.6% | +22.4% |
| 2026 | -3.0% | +15.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ANNA and VT good diversifiers for each other?
Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ANNA and VT?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ANNA and VT is -0.17 over 3 years, -0.54 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.
Is VT a good diversifier for ANNA?
Yes: at -0.17, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.
What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.17 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/anna-vs-vt.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/anna-vs-vt/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ANNA correlations · VT correlations
