PairBook
HomeANNA › ANNA vs RCL

ANNA vs RCL: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) and Royal Caribbean Group (RCL) carry a correlation of -0.19, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.19
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.35
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-694.1
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ANNA and RCL?

Over the past 3 years, ANNA and RCL moved with a correlation of -0.19, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.35 versus -0.19 over 3 years. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.14, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -694.1 %².

By 3-year correlation, RCL places #49 of the 103 assets tracked against ANNA. On 12-month performance RCL holds a 15.0-point edge, -34.3% against -19.3%. One caveat on sizing: ANNA is 2.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ANNA vs RCL: side by side

ANNA (AleAnna, Inc.)RCL (Royal Caribbean Group)
1-year return-34.3%-19.3%
5-year return-71.7%+257.6%
Volatility (ann.)88.7%41.3%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.921.46
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.3%-35.0%
Market cap$0.1B$76.2B
P/E (trailing)14.717.9
Dividend yield0.00%1.72%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Discretionary
Lower P/E: ANNA 14.7 vs 17.9Higher yield: RCL 1.72% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: RCL -35.0% vs -86.3%Higher 5y return: RCL +257.6% vs -71.7%
-43%0%+102%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ANNA · RCL

Year-by-year returns

YearANNARCL
2022-35.7%
2023+7.3%+162.0%
2024-37.6%+79.0%
2025-57.6%+22.5%
2026-3.0%+3.2%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ANNA and RCL good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ANNA and RCL?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ANNA and RCL is -0.19 over 3 years, -0.35 over 1 year and -0.14 over 5 years.

Is RCL a good diversifier for ANNA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.19 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.19 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.19 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/anna-vs-rcl.json

ANNA vs RCL: 3-year weekly correlation -0.19ANNA vs RCL-0.19

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ANNA vs RCL correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/anna-vs-rcl.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/anna-vs-rcl/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ANNA correlations · RCL correlations