PairBook
HomeANNA › ANNA vs MTD

ANNA vs MTD: Correlation

How closely do AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) and Mettler Toledo (MTD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.17, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.17
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.29
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.14
long-run
Ann. covariance
-487.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ANNA and MTD?

On 3 years of weekly data the ANNA/MTD correlation comes out at -0.17, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.29) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.17). The 5-year figure is -0.14, and annualized covariance runs at -487.3 %².

By 3-year correlation, MTD places #32 of the 103 assets tracked against ANNA. The last year tells two different stories: MTD led by 43.8 percentage points, -34.3% for ANNA against +9.5% for MTD. Note the risk asymmetry: ANNA runs 2.8 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ANNA vs MTD: side by side

ANNA (AleAnna, Inc.)MTD (Mettler Toledo)
1-year return-34.3%+9.5%
5-year return-71.7%-11.4%
Volatility (ann.)88.7%31.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.921.00
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.3%-36.6%
Market cap$0.1B$28.2B
P/E (trailing)14.731.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Lower P/E: ANNA 14.7 vs 31.7Smaller drawdown: MTD -36.6% vs -86.3%Higher 5y return: MTD -11.4% vs -71.7%
-43%0%+102%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ANNA · MTD

Year-by-year returns

YearANNAMTD
2022-14.8%
2023+7.3%-16.1%
2024-37.6%+0.9%
2025-57.6%+13.9%
2026-3.0%+0.9%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ANNA and MTD good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ANNA and MTD?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.17 over 3 years, with -0.29 over the last year and -0.14 over 5 years.

Is MTD a good diversifier for ANNA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.17 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.17 mean?

A reading of -0.17 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/anna-vs-mtd.json

ANNA vs MTD: 3-year weekly correlation -0.17ANNA vs MTD-0.17

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ANNA vs MTD correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/anna-vs-mtd.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/anna-vs-mtd/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ANNA correlations · MTD correlations