PairBook
HomeANNA › ANNA vs MKC

ANNA vs MKC: Correlation

How closely do AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) and McCormick & Company (MKC) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.25, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.25
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.44
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.20
long-run
Ann. covariance
-595.5
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ANNA and MKC?

Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of ANNA and MKC correlate at -0.25, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.44) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.25). Stretching to 5 years gives -0.20, with an annualized covariance of -595.5 %².

Among the 103 assets we track against ANNA, MKC ranks #87 by 3-year correlation. On 12-month performance MKC holds a 14.0-point edge, -34.3% against -20.3%. One caveat on sizing: ANNA is 3.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ANNA vs MKC: side by side

ANNA (AleAnna, Inc.)MKC (McCormick & Company)
1-year return-34.3%-20.3%
5-year return-71.7%-28.5%
Volatility (ann.)88.7%26.5%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.920.24
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.3%-44.3%
Market cap$0.1B$14.7B
P/E (trailing)14.79.2
Dividend yield0.00%3.38%
Sector / categoryUS ListedConsumer Staples
Lower P/E: MKC 9.2 vs 14.7Higher yield: MKC 3.38% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: MKC -44.3% vs -86.3%Higher 5y return: MKC -28.5% vs -71.7%
-43%0%+102%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. ANNA · MKC

Year-by-year returns

YearANNAMKC
2022-12.7%
2023+7.3%-15.7%
2024-37.6%+14.0%
2025-57.6%-8.3%
2026-3.0%-18.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ANNA and MKC good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, ANNA and MKC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ANNA and MKC?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ANNA and MKC is -0.25 over 3 years, -0.44 over 1 year and -0.20 over 5 years.

Is MKC a good diversifier for ANNA?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.25, ANNA and MKC have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.25 mean?

On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.25 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/anna-vs-mkc.json

ANNA vs MKC: 3-year weekly correlation -0.25ANNA vs MKC-0.25

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![ANNA vs MKC correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/anna-vs-mkc.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/anna-vs-mkc/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ANNA correlations · MKC correlations