ANNA vs EPR: Correlation
AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) and EPR Properties (EPR) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are ANNA and EPR?
On 3 years of weekly data the ANNA/EPR correlation comes out at -0.24, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Lately the two have drifted apart, with the 1-year correlation at -0.41 versus -0.24 over 3 years. The 5-year figure is -0.18, and annualized covariance runs at -506.4 %².
Among the 103 assets we track against ANNA, EPR ranks #80 by 3-year correlation. The last year tells two different stories: EPR led by 50.2 percentage points, -34.3% for ANNA against +15.9% for EPR. Risk is not evenly split, since ANNA carries 3.7 times the volatility of the other side.
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
ANNA vs EPR: side by side
| ANNA (AleAnna, Inc.) | EPR (EPR Properties) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -34.3% | +15.9% |
| 5-year return | -71.7% | +67.8% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 88.7% | 24.0% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | -0.92 | 0.62 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -86.3% | -19.5% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $4.6B |
| P/E (trailing) | 14.7 | 19.2 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | ANNA | EPR |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | – | -14.6% |
| 2023 | +7.3% | +38.8% |
| 2024 | -37.6% | -1.3% |
| 2025 | -57.6% | +20.5% |
| 2026 | -3.0% | +24.0% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are ANNA and EPR good diversifiers for each other?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
FAQ
What is the correlation between ANNA and EPR?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ANNA and EPR is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.41 over 1 year and -0.18 over 5 years.
Is EPR a good diversifier for ANNA?
By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.
What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?
On the −1 to +1 scale, -0.24 describes how much the two returns move together: +1 is lockstep, 0 is independence, negative values mean opposite directions. It says nothing about which performed better.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/anna-vs-epr.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/anna-vs-epr/)
Free with attribution; caching and terms are described in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: ANNA correlations · EPR correlations
