PairBook
HomeANNA › ANNA vs BAX

ANNA vs BAX: Correlation

How closely do AleAnna, Inc. (ANNA) and Baxter International (BAX) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.22, which is negative.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.39
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.19
long-run
Ann. covariance
-748.4
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are ANNA and BAX?

Over the past 3 years, ANNA and BAX moved with a correlation of -0.22, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The link has loosened recently: the 1-year correlation (-0.39) runs below the 3-year figure (-0.22). Over 5 years the correlation is -0.19, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -748.4 %².

By 3-year correlation, BAX places #65 of the 103 assets tracked against ANNA. The last year tells two different stories: BAX led by 40.9 percentage points, -34.3% for ANNA against +6.6% for BAX. One caveat on sizing: ANNA is 2.3 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

ANNA vs BAX: side by side

ANNA (AleAnna, Inc.)BAX (Baxter International)
1-year return-34.3%+6.6%
5-year return-71.7%-62.2%
Volatility (ann.)88.7%38.4%
Beta vs S&P 500-0.920.89
Max drawdown (3Y)-86.3%-62.4%
Market cap$0.1B$13.4B
P/E (trailing)14.7
Dividend yield0.00%0.75%
Sector / categoryUS ListedHealth Care
Higher yield: BAX 0.75% vs 0.00%Smaller drawdown: BAX -62.4% vs -86.3%Higher 5y return: BAX -62.2% vs -71.7%
-43%0%+102%2025-09-052026-08-27
Price paths over the last 12 months, both indexed to 100 at the start (weekly closes). ANNA · BAX

Year-by-year returns

YearANNABAX
2022-39.6%
2023+7.3%-21.9%
2024-37.6%-22.4%
2025-57.6%-33.3%
2026-3.0%+35.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are ANNA and BAX good diversifiers for each other?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, ANNA and BAX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

FAQ

What is the correlation between ANNA and BAX?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between ANNA and BAX is -0.22 over 3 years, -0.39 over 1 year and -0.19 over 5 years.

Is BAX a good diversifier for ANNA?

Yes. With a correlation of -0.22, ANNA and BAX have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/anna-vs-bax.json

ANNA vs BAX: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22ANNA vs BAX-0.22

Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:

[![ANNA vs BAX correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/anna-vs-bax.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/anna-vs-bax/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: ANNA correlations · BAX correlations