PairBook
HomeAMWL › AMWL vs VXZ

AMWL vs VXZ: Correlation

Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, American Well Corporation (AMWL) and iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN (VXZ) carry a correlation of -0.22, a negative link.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.22
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.19
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.28
long-run
Ann. covariance
-445.6
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AMWL and VXZ?

On 3 years of weekly data the AMWL/VXZ correlation comes out at -0.22, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (-0.19) sits close to the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.28, and annualized covariance runs at -445.6 %².

VXZ is close to the least connected end of AMWL's tracked universe, ranking #8 of 10. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with AMWL ahead by 85.2 points (+69.1% versus -16.1%). One caveat on sizing: AMWL is 3.1 times as volatile as the other leg, so an equal-dollar split is far from equal-risk.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AMWL vs VXZ: side by side

AMWL (American Well Corporation)VXZ (iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures ETN)
1-year return+69.1%-16.1%
5-year return-94.4%-53.1%
Volatility (ann.)78.9%25.6%
Beta vs S&P 5002.13-1.31
Max drawdown (3Y)-88.0%-36.4%
Market cap$0.2B
P/E (trailing)
Dividend yield0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: VXZ -36.4% vs -88.0%Higher 5y return: VXZ -53.1% vs -94.4%
-45%0%+94%2025-09-052026-08-27
Both assets over the last year, indexed to 100 at the starting week. AMWL · VXZ

Year-by-year returns

YearAMWLVXZ
2022-53.1%+0.5%
2023-47.3%-44.0%
2024-75.7%-12.7%
2025-32.3%+5.7%
2026+139.3%-10.5%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AMWL and VXZ good diversifiers for each other?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AMWL and VXZ?

Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.22 over 3 years, with -0.19 over the last year and -0.28 over 5 years.

Is VXZ a good diversifier for AMWL?

Yes: at -0.22, the two have gone their own ways historically, which is what genuine diversification looks like.

What does a correlation of -0.22 mean?

A reading of -0.22 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amwl-vs-vxz.json

AMWL vs VXZ: 3-year weekly correlation -0.22AMWL vs VXZ-0.22

Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:

[![AMWL vs VXZ correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/amwl-vs-vxz.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amwl-vs-vxz/)

The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AMWL correlations · VXZ correlations