AMWL vs FNGD: Correlation
How closely do American Well Corporation (AMWL) and MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due (FNGD) trade together? Their weekly returns over three years give a correlation of -0.29, which is negative.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AMWL and FNGD?
On 3 years of weekly data the AMWL/FNGD correlation comes out at -0.29, negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.32 lands near the 3-year figure. The 5-year figure is -0.38, and annualized covariance runs at -1718.3 %².
Out of 10 assets tracked against AMWL, FNGD lands near the bottom at #10. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months AMWL outperformed by 124.8 percentage points (+69.1% for AMWL against -55.7% for FNGD).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AMWL vs FNGD: side by side
| AMWL (American Well Corporation) | FNGD (MicroSectors FANG Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs due) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +69.1% | -55.7% |
| 5-year return | -94.4% | -99.4% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 78.9% | 75.7% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 2.13 | -4.54 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -88.0% | -97.6% |
| Market cap | $0.2B | – |
| P/E (trailing) | – | 20.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AMWL | FNGD |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -53.1% | +52.2% |
| 2023 | -47.3% | -90.1% |
| 2024 | -75.7% | -76.6% |
| 2025 | -32.3% | -61.4% |
| 2026 | +139.3% | -49.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AMWL and FNGD good diversifiers for each other?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.29, AMWL and FNGD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AMWL and FNGD?
Using weekly returns as of 2026-08-27: -0.29 over 3 years, with -0.32 over the last year and -0.38 over 5 years.
Is FNGD a good diversifier for AMWL?
Yes. With a correlation of -0.29, AMWL and FNGD have moved largely independently, which makes them a genuinely diversifying pair by historical standards.
What does a correlation of -0.29 mean?
A reading of -0.29 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amwl-vs-fngd.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amwl-vs-fngd/)
The core API is free. Terms and every endpoint in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AMWL correlations · FNGD correlations
