AMN vs BLMN: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, AMN Healthcare Services Inc (AMN) and Bloomin' Brands, Inc. (BLMN) carry a correlation of 0.48, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AMN and BLMN?
Across a 3-year window, the weekly returns of AMN and BLMN correlate at 0.48, moderate. The relationship has been stable: the 1-year correlation (0.50) sits close to the 3-year figure. Stretching to 5 years gives 0.42, with an annualized covariance of 1661.9 %².
In AMN's tracked universe of 10 assets, BLMN sits right near the top at #2. Correlation aside, the last 12 months split them widely, with AMN ahead by 30.6 points (+74.4% versus +43.8%).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AMN vs BLMN: side by side
| AMN (AMN Healthcare Services Inc) | BLMN (Bloomin' Brands, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +74.4% | +43.8% |
| 5-year return | -68.4% | -53.9% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 57.2% | 61.1% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 0.53 | 1.23 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -83.2% | -80.5% |
| Market cap | $1.4B | $0.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | 12.7 | 32.6 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.35% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AMN | BLMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -15.9% | -1.7% |
| 2023 | -27.2% | +45.5% |
| 2024 | -68.1% | -54.4% |
| 2025 | -34.1% | -46.6% |
| 2026 | +122.6% | +69.2% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AMN and BLMN good diversifiers for each other?
A fair diversifier. At 0.48, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AMN and BLMN?
As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AMN and BLMN is 0.48 over 3 years, 0.50 over 1 year and 0.42 over 5 years.
Is BLMN a good diversifier for AMN?
A fair diversifier. At 0.48, enough of each asset's movement is its own that the pair has smoothed outcomes historically.
What does a correlation of 0.48 mean?
Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/amn-vs-blmn.json
Drop this badge in a README or notebook; it updates with the data:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/amn-vs-blmn/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AMN correlations · BLMN correlations
