PairBook
HomeAKA › AKA vs RBKB

AKA vs RBKB: Correlation

a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (AKA) and Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc. (RBKB) show a negative relationship: their 3-year correlation of weekly returns is -0.24.

Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology

Correlation (3Y)
-0.24
negative
Correlation (1Y)
-0.21
last 12 months
Correlation (5Y)
-0.12
long-run
Ann. covariance
-769.3
%² · weekly, annualized

How correlated are AKA and RBKB?

Over the past 3 years, AKA and RBKB moved with a correlation of -0.24, which is negative, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. Little has changed lately, as the 1-year reading of -0.21 lands near the 3-year figure. Over 5 years the correlation is -0.12, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is -769.3 %².

Out of 11 assets tracked against AKA, RBKB lands near the bottom at #9. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months RBKB outperformed by 37.8 percentage points (-6.3% for AKA against +31.5% for RBKB). Note the risk asymmetry: AKA runs 3.7 times the annualized volatility of the other leg, so equal-weighting the two is not an equal-risk position.

How is this computed?

Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.

AKA vs RBKB: side by side

AKA (a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.)RBKB (Rhinebeck Bancorp, Inc.)
1-year return-6.3%+31.5%
5-year return-91.2%+64.9%
Volatility (ann.)108.8%29.5%
Beta vs S&P 5001.320.08
Max drawdown (3Y)-76.3%-30.0%
Market cap$0.1B$0.2B
P/E (trailing)14.0
Dividend yield0.00%0.00%
Sector / categoryUS ListedUS Listed
Smaller drawdown: RBKB -30.0% vs -76.3%Higher 5y return: RBKB +64.9% vs -91.2%
-29%0%+39%2025-09-052026-08-27
Twelve months of weekly closes, each series rebased to 100. AKA · RBKB

Year-by-year returns

YearAKARBKB
2022-86.3%-14.5%
2023-47.2%-11.6%
2024+132.5%+20.1%
2025-42.8%+24.3%
2026-1.3%+46.8%

Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.

Are AKA and RBKB good diversifiers for each other?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

FAQ

What is the correlation between AKA and RBKB?

As of 2026-08-27, the correlation of weekly returns between AKA and RBKB is -0.24 over 3 years, -0.21 over 1 year and -0.12 over 5 years.

Is RBKB a good diversifier for AKA?

By historical standards, yes. A correlation of -0.24 means the two rarely move for the same reasons.

What does a correlation of -0.24 mean?

Correlation ranges from −1 to +1. Values near +1 mean two assets move together, near 0 that they move independently, and negative values that they tend to move in opposite directions. It measures co-movement, not performance.

Use this data

JSON API · no key required
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aka-vs-rbkb.json

AKA vs RBKB: 3-year weekly correlation -0.24AKA vs RBKB-0.24

Markdown for the live badge, attribution link included:

[![AKA vs RBKB correlation](https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/badge/aka-vs-rbkb.svg)](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aka-vs-rbkb/)

No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.

Related comparisons

Hubs: AKA correlations · RBKB correlations