AKA vs CLYM: Correlation
Measured on weekly returns over the past three years, a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp. (AKA) and Climb Bio, Inc. (CLYM) carry a correlation of 0.37, a moderate link.
Data as of 2026-08-27 · refreshed every trading day · weekly returns · methodology
How correlated are AKA and CLYM?
Over the past 3 years, AKA and CLYM moved with a correlation of 0.37, which is moderate. The past 12 months show a weaker link (0.22) than the 3-year average (0.37). Over 5 years the correlation is 0.31, and the annualized covariance of weekly returns is 5343.0 %².
CLYM is one of the assets that tracks AKA most closely: it ranks #2 out of the 11 assets we track against AKA. Their recent paths diverged sharply: over the last 12 months CLYM outperformed by 565.4 percentage points (-6.3% for AKA against +559.1% for CLYM).
How is this computed?
Pearson correlation on weekly returns: ρ(A,B) = cov(rA, rB) / (σA · σB), over windows of 52, 156 and 260 weeks. Covariance is annualized (×52) and expressed in %². Full definitions on the methodology page.
AKA vs CLYM: side by side
| AKA (a.k.a. Brands Holding Corp.) | CLYM (Climb Bio, Inc.) | |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | -6.3% | +559.1% |
| 5-year return | -91.2% | -46.2% |
| Volatility (ann.) | 108.8% | 132.2% |
| Beta vs S&P 500 | 1.32 | 1.11 |
| Max drawdown (3Y) | -76.3% | -88.9% |
| Market cap | $0.1B | $0.9B |
| P/E (trailing) | – | – |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Sector / category | US Listed | US Listed |
Year-by-year returns
| Year | AKA | CLYM |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 | -86.3% | -64.9% |
| 2023 | -47.2% | -26.4% |
| 2024 | +132.5% | -33.3% |
| 2025 | -42.8% | +122.2% |
| 2026 | -1.3% | +276.5% |
Calendar-year price returns; the current year is year-to-date as of the data date above.
Are AKA and CLYM good diversifiers for each other?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.37 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
FAQ
What is the correlation between AKA and CLYM?
The AKA/CLYM correlation stands at 0.37 on a 3-year window (1 year: 0.22, 5 years: 0.31), computed from weekly returns as of 2026-08-27.
Is CLYM a good diversifier for AKA?
Yes, to a useful degree: a correlation of 0.37 leaves real independence between the two, which historically damped combined volatility.
What does a correlation of 0.37 mean?
A reading of 0.37 sits on a scale from −1 (opposite moves) through 0 (unrelated) to +1 (identical moves). Correlation captures direction, not magnitude or performance.
Use this data
$ curl https://www.pairbook.io/api/v1/pairs/aka-vs-clym.json
Embed this badge (it refreshes with the data), with attribution:
[](https://www.pairbook.io/pair/aka-vs-clym/)
No key needed, free to use. Full endpoint list in the API documentation.
Related comparisons
Hubs: AKA correlations · CLYM correlations
